‘Complete double standard’: Tobacco giant lobbied against rules in Africa which are mandatory in UK
British American Tobacco has been accused of “complete double standards” for opposing anti-smoking regulations in Africa that are already in place in the UK.
African regulatory opposition
Correspondence acquired by reporters sent from the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the country’s government ministers requests measures restricting tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be canceled or deferred.
The tobacco firm seeks modifications of a pending law that include reductions in the suggested dimensions of visual health alerts on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on scented cigarette varieties, and watered-down penalties for any firms breaking the new laws.
Anti-tobacco campaigner response
“Were I in government, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” stated Master Chimbala.
Over seven thousand citizens a year pass away from smoking-associated diseases, according to WHO calculations.
The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to several government departments and was in circulation among civil society groups.
International corporate influence worries
The situation emerges alongside wider concerns about business sector influence with health policies. Last month, international health experts raised concerns that the cigarette manufacturers was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.
“There is proof of corporate influence globally. Tobacco company fingerprints are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, stalled legislation in Zambia and even a weakened declaration at the UN high-level meeting,” commented Jorge Alday.
Likely impacts
“When public health regulation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in individuals' health who might potentially stop smoking.”
The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and mandating that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.
Business countermeasures
Through correspondence, the company recommends this be decreased to less than half “according to global suggested parameters”, delayed for at least one year after the bill passes.
Global health authorities in fact recommends a warning should cover at least fifty percent of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. Across the United Kingdom, warnings are required to occupy sixty-five percent of a cigarette pack surfaces.
Scented product controversy
The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on scented smoking items, claiming that it would lead smokers to “black market” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “scents derived from desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been outlawed across the UK since 2020.
The proposed legislation recommends punishments for different infractions “varying from a portion of yearly revenue to 10 years’ imprisonment”.
Business explanation
Via documentation, the corporate leader of the African subsidiary claims the corporation is focused on responsible corporate conduct” and “endorses the aims of governments to lower tobacco use and the connected wellbeing effects” but asserts that “some regulations can have undesirable and unforeseen outcomes.”
Critic response
The advocate stated the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.
The fact that multiple comparable regulations were present in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he said.
“We live in a connected world. When I cultivate smoking products in my back yard and gather the crop and sell it out – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to enrich myself and all the generations of my children while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself complete moral failure.”
Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had failed to shutter businesses, Chimbala said. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”
Standard business position
The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Moreover, the corporation engages in the country’s legislative process in line with the relevant frameworks which provide for interested party involvement in legislation creation.”
The corporation remained “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be safeguarded against obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.
“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of entitlements and duties on corporations, customers and associated groups,” the spokesperson stated, adding that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and cigarette sector, which involves increasing amounts of black market activity”.
The country's office of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.